Featured

Semester Reflection Questions

Why do people form discourse communities, that is, what motivates people to join these communities?

  • In my opinion, discourse communities are formed and joined for multiple reasons. People can join or form a discourse community because they want to be around people who think the same way or share a common interest. For example, in the assignment two example paper, the Ripper Paper, the author joined a discourse community where everyone shared a common interest in solving the Jack the Ripper case. People might also join or form a discourse community because they will gain money or power. For example, someone might become a doctor, and join a discourse community of doctors, because they feel that doctors are respected or make a lot of money.

What do you think people gain from joining a discourse community?

  • People can gain a lot of things from joining a discourse community. For example, as I discussed in the last answer, people can gain power and money from joining a discourse community. As I also discussed in the last answer, people can gain friendship and a sense of belonging through joining a discourse community of people with common interests or ways of thinking.

How is writing used to police the community’s membership? 

  • Discourse communities can use writing to define the rules that members of the community must follow. For example, the social work community has a written Code of Ethics that polices the members of our community. The Code of Ethics outlines rules and behaviors that social workers must uphold, such as respecting a client’s right to privacy. If a social worker chooses to violate a client’s right to privacy, then that social worker may lose their license and be expelled from the community.

Why do you think writing is key in delineating a discourse community from a speech community?

  • Writing is key in delineating a discourse community from a speech community. This is because traditionally, as explained by John Swales, speech communities communicate through specific speech, which requires a knowledge of that speech and its patterns. According to Swales, this makes speech communities much more localized, whereas discourse communities use writing that takes away the localization and makes it more likely for people in distant places to reply.

Rough Draft – Assignment 2

For many years, the purpose of the social work community has been “to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (Code of Ethics). I joined this community because the mission statement of this community really resonated with me. I wanted to join a career that allowed me to help others and that surrounded me with others who were also passionate about helping others. The Code of Ethics is a written artifact that outlines our community’s mission, values, and rules. The purpose of this document is to provide common rules and ways of thinking for all social workers to uphold ethical standards and protect the rights of our clients. If a social worker does not uphold the standards from the Code of Ethics then they can lose their license.

The Code of Ethics used by social workers is integral in the establishment of rules in this community. The Code of Ethics contains a section called “Ethical Standards” that establishes the ethical standards that all social workers must abide by. For example, the following excerpt from the Code of Ethics shows one established standard that all social workers must follow.

1.01 Commitment to Clients

Social workers’ primary responsibility is to promote the well-being of clients. In general, clients’ interests are primary. However, social workers’ responsibility to the larger society or specific legal obligations may on limited occasions supersede the loyalty owed clients, and clients should be so advised. (Examples include when a social worker is required by law to report that a client has abused a child or has threatened to harm self or others.)

The Code of Ethics used by social workers is integral in the establishment of rules in this community. The Code of Ethics contains a section called “Ethical Standards” that establishes the ethical standards that all social workers must abide by. For example, the following excerpt from the Code of Ethics shows one established standard that all social workers must follow.

1.01 Commitment to Clients

Social workers’ primary responsibility is to promote the well-being of clients. In general, clients’ interests are primary. However, social workers’ responsibility to the larger society or specific legal obligations may on limited occasions supersede the loyalty owed clients, and clients should be so advised. (Examples include when a social worker is required by law to report that a client has abused a child or has threatened to harm self or others.)

What is shown in this excerpt is a clearly written rule that social workers must follow. Social workers must respect the privacy of all clients unless they are a danger to themselves or others and all clients have a right to know this. This is an established rule that is made public through the publication of the Code of Ethics.

The Code of Ethics used by social workers is integral in the establishment of the rhetoric used in this discourse community. For example, the Code of Ethics provides definitions of terms that are used frequently by social workers. The next example can be found in the “Ethical Principles” section of the Code of Ethics.

Value: Service

Ethical Principle: Social workers’ primary goal is to help people in need and to address social problems.

Social workers elevate service to others above self-interest. Social workers draw on their knowledge, values, and skills to help people in need and to address social problems. Social workers are encouraged to volunteer some portion of their professional skills with no expectation of significant financial return (pro bono service).

This excerpt is a good example of how the Code of Ethics defines certain terms in regards to the social work community. As shown above, the term “service” as defined by the social work community means that social workers should help people and try to volunteer when they can.

This discourse community is often “at odds” with the general public. Members of the social work community know that there are many different kinds of social work, and each one does something completely different from the next. However, members of the general public who are unfamiliar with the social work community may sometimes refer to social workers as “baby snatchers” due to their lack of understanding of the way that this community works. Members of this community are often also at odds with the general public due to the nature of their jobs. Social workers may play an integral role in helping impoverished families apply for different kinds of welfare. There has been recently been a long debate between citizens in the United States over the use of welfare. Those people who believe that welfare is given out too often or costs too much may be at odds with social workers because they do not approve of their use of welfare.

HW 7/24

I. Introduction

  1. Identify the discourse community: Social Work
  2. Explain why I am joining this community
  3. Introduce the written artifact: Code of Ethics
  4. Thesis: Social workers have the Code of Ethics to enforce common rules and ways of thinking for all social workers.

II. Body

  1. Explain how the document dictates rules by giving examples from the Code of Ethics that represent the ethical principles and standards that all social workers are expected to uphold
  2. Explain how the Code of Ethics dictates rhetoric by giving examples from the text of specific terms that all social workers use. For example, the Code of Ethics dictates that all social workers refer to the individuals they work with as “clients.”

III. Conclusion

  1. Identify conflicts that social workers have with the general public by identifying misconceptions about the community. For example, many people believe that all social workers are “baby snatchers” or that social workers give out too many “handouts” in reference to food stamps, etc..

CL 7/24

Ripper Paper + Ana Paper

  • “Gut reactions” to the Ripper Paper
    • My “gut reaction” to this paper is that it is very interesting. I think it is really cool that the author was able to turn their passion for Jack the Ripper into a career in criminal justice.
  • “Gut reactions” to the Ana Paper
    • My “gut reaction” to this paper is that it is heart-wrenching. I have been in the same position as this person has, and it’s difficult to watch others go through it. I wish we had read a different paper other than this one.

Let’s answer these questions:

  1. Can you name the writers’ various causes for joining their discourse communities?
    • The author of the Ripper Paper joined their discourse community because they had a common interest in Jack the Ripper and the author of the Ana Paper joined this discourse community because they felt that this community could help them achieve the “perfect” body.
  2. Can you name what the writers say are the respective effects of their memberships in their discourse communities?
    • The author of the Ripper Paper has gained a new way of thinking and a career in criminal justice due to their discourse community membership and the author of the Ana Paper had organ failure due to their discourse community membership
  3. While I find the narrative in the “ripper paper” file to be exceptionally good, explain how the “ana paper” is just as good but achieves this quality in a different way.
    • In my opinion, the Ana Paper was different from the Ripper Paper because it was more emotional. The Ripper Paper was a personal story and it was interesting, but the Author of the Ana Paper told a sadder and more private story. Their narrative was exceptionally good because it evokes so much emotion from the reader.
  4. How do you think the document you’ll produce for this assignment be different than the document you produced for assignment one?
    • My document for assignment one will be different from assignment two because assignment two will be more personal. In assignment one we had to analyze a historical document so there was not much room for personal feelings and emotion. In assignment two, we are sharing personal stories of how we joined our discourse communities, so it will have more of a focus on emotion.
  5. What questions do you have for me?
    • N/A

HW 7/22

There are a variety of different ways that I could use primary research to complete assignment two. I could survey some social workers or survey the public on their opinions about social workers. I could also interview some of the people I know who are social workers. I could also interview another person majoring in social work. Lastly, I could observe a social worker for a day.

CL 7/19

Brainstorming Discourse Communities:

  • Restaurant Workers
  • Social Workers
  • Teachers

Why I Joined Each Discourse Community:

  • Restaurant Workers: I joined this community because I needed a job and money
  • Social Workers: I am getting a degree in social work and joining this community because I love the work and I share similar goals with other social workers, such as advocating for the safety of my clients
  • Teachers: I am a (volunteer) tutor at a middle school and I joined this community because I really love the job

Types of Writing in Discourse Communities:

  • Restaurant Workers: We constantly use the same menu and slang terms, for example, if a co-worker yells at something, I have to respond with “heard” so they know that I have heard, I now say “heard” in place of the word okay even when I’m not at work.
  • Social Workers: We have a code of ethics that every social worker must know by heart and strictly follow
  • Teachers: We have a set of rules that all tutors must agree to in order to join the program

Ideology of these Documents:

  • Restaurant Workers: Our menu broadcasts a certain level of class which amounts to a higher price which I do not accept
  • Social Workers: The code of ethics has a preamble that lists all of the main goals of social workers, all of which I find amazing and accept as personal and work goals
  • Teachers: Our set of rules for the tutors is designed to keep the kids we work with safe, and I accept them

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started